HAMILTON ADVISORS
APRIL 2000 COMMENTARY
Today is Sunday, April 9, 2000, and there is a snowstorm here in
Greenwich with a forecast of up to six inches before yesterday's
temperatures in the low 70s return. Thousands of magnolia blossoms
that have made their debut within the last several days now lie
helplessly on the porch's wet cement unable to bear the weight of the
snow coupled with the wintry gusts.
We are telling you this because there seems to be an uncanny
correlation between today's weather's behavior and the stock markets'
behavior.
Last Tuesday, April 4th, the Nasdaq made a record-breaking 1,074 point
round trip. Bill Gates' loss was a reported $12 Billion for the day as
Microsoft's market value reportedly dropped a little over $80 Billion.
Don't cry for Bill. He is still the wealthiest man in the world.
The April 5th Investor's Business Daily carried as its Number One
story: Intraday Panic Cuts 13.6% Off Nasdaq Till Buyers Bite
--- The Nasdaq's correction turned into a scary freefall -- with the
index losing 575 points or 13.6% of its value -- before bargain
hunters stepped up and pulled it back to a loss of just 75. Volume was
a staggering 2.9 billion shares. The action among the blue chips was
less pronounced but no less breathtaking. The Dow industrials plunged
504 points, or 4.5%, before recovering to lose 57."
The Nasdaq peaked on March 10th with an intraday high of 5132 and
declined 1,483 points or 29% on April 4th to 3649 within a period of
16 business days.
The incredible, mind-boggling volatility continues.
We wrote on March 9th in our Clients' Report:
"Meanwhile the separation between the 'New Economy' and 'Old
Economy' stocks continues to widen. The former is the equivalent of
technology, bio-technology, internet and dot.com companies while the
latter is thought of as being comprised of 'smokestack' stocks, autos,
oils, foods and America's other Blue Chip companies that have always
represented this country's industrial strength.
"We do not like those terms but will put up with them for now because
they do have a certain illustrative value. For example, as of
yesterday the Nasdaq (New Economy) had risen to the 5000 level for the
first time in history while Procter and Gamble (Old Economy) warned of
an earnings shortfall before the NYSE opened.
"Result: P&G opened down close to 30 points which immediately erased
about one third of its $115 Billion market value. It is down several
more points again this morning.
"At the end of New York Stock Exchange trading on March 7th, P&G had
lost about $40 Billion of its value, and the Dow Jones Industrials
closed down almost 400 points after an intraday loss exceeding 400
points. This was its fourth largest point loss in history."
That was less than a month ago when the Old Economy stocks were out of
favor. Within three weeks the markets and investor psychology had
dramatically reversed. We feel confident in predicting that these
conditions will continue as the struggle between value investors and
the tech investors continues.
Ironically, or perhaps not ironically, the major article on
The Financial
Times' March 7th front page carried the title "SEC warns on
market risks." It continued:
"America's chief stock market watchdog on Monday warned investors
to be on guard against biased advice, flimsy business plans and a
'casino mentality' in the US equity markets.
"'Unless investors truly understand both the opportunities and risks
of today's market, too many may fall victim to their own wishful
thinking,' said Arthur Levitt, chairman of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
"Mr. Levitt has issued such warnings before, but the timing of his
remarks - with the technology-fuelled Nasdaq Composite Index on the
brink of breaking through the 5,000 mark - gave added weight to his
speech at a conference on the New Economy.
"Many newly floated internet companies command record price/earning
multiples. Mr. Levitt said that made it particularly hard for
investors to work out what companies were worth. 'Are some of today's
companies really worth 1,000 times nothing?' he asked the audience of
1,800 at the Jesuit university." (Boston College)
As an investor you should be aware of the fact that Customer Margin
Debt at Broker-Dealers (borrowed money used to buy stocks) increased
9.1% in February and has increased nearly 50% since last September.
Customer Margin debt was at an all-time high of $265.2 Billion at the
end of February 2000. This does not include hedge fund debt used for
the same purpose. Nor does it include borrowed money put to use in
equity derivative transactions employed by JP Morgan, Bank of America,
Citigroup and Chase Manhattan - to name a few.
We can only wonder what the change in the novice investors' collective
psychology might be after their receiving the deluge of margin calls
and, in some instances, being sold out last week. Getting a margin
call to repay your loan is one thing. Getting sold out (when your
broker liquidates your entire account to get his money back) is a real
attention-getter. Knowing only the symbol of a company without knowing
its name let alone what its business is, generally will put the
"investor" on a fast track of learning how both getting a margin
call(s) and being sold out really works. It's sort of an Old Economy
thing.
We continue to focus on clients' capital preservation and to seek out
investment opportunities that are surfacing as a result of the
markets' upheaval and volatility. We applaud the superb advances that
are being made in biotechnology, communications and other New Economy
endeavors. The problem, however, continues to be what prices should be
paid for these companies.
Meanwhile, avoiding the land mines in these tumultuous markets is
not easy.
Your comments are always welcome, and we invite you to visit our Web
site
www.hamiltonadvisors.com.
|
|
John, W. Hamilton
April 9, 2000
JWH: mm
jwh@hamiltonadvisors.com
|
Market value information (including
prices, accrued income, and currency exchange rates)
furnished in these reports may be based on data obtained
from one or more vendors. Although this information
comes from sources considered reliable, neither Hamilton
Advisors, Inc. nor any of its vendors makes any
representations or warranties, express or implied,
concerning the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of
such information. Republication without Hamilton
Advisors Inc. prior written consent is prohibited.
|
|